Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in
S src
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Locked Files
  • Issues 62
    • Issues 62
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
  • Merge requests 4
    • Merge requests 4
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI/CD
    • Code Review
    • Issue
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • OPAL
  • src
  • Issues
  • #189

Closed
Open
Created Dec 05, 2017 by Valeria Rizzoglio@rizzoglio_v

DESIGNENERGY and Field map extension

According to the manual for OPAL <=1.6:

If the bend strength is set by K0 and/or K0S, then the actual beam will be bent a different angle if its energy does not correspond to the DESIGNENERGY of the bend

A beam energy different from DESIGNENERGY would change the bending radius and angle depending on K0. The beam trajectory matches always with the reference path inside the dipole.

The bending radius defines the extension of the field map. It is not clear to me if and how the redefinition of bending radius (due to a beam energy different from DESIGNENERGY) impacts on the field map extension.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking