benchmarks.asciidoc

@@ -556,8 +556,8 @@ E1=0, E2=0,
 ....
 +
 .TRACE 3D and _OPAL_ comparison: SBEND without edge angles,
-image:figures/Benchmarks/SBEND_noEdge_Env.png[width=350]
-image:figures/Benchmarks/SBEND_noEdge_Emi.png[width=350]
+image:figures/Benchmarks/SBEND_noEdge_Env.png[width=340]
+image:figures/Benchmarks/SBEND_noEdge_Emi.png[width=340]
 +
 A good overall agreement has been found between the two codes in term of
 beam size and emittance. The different behavior inside the bending
@@ -572,8 +572,8 @@ E1=10*Pi/180.0, E2=5* Pi/180.0,
 ....
 +
 .TRACE 3D and _OPAL_ comparison: SBEND with edge angles
-image:figures/Benchmarks/SBEND_Edges_Env.png[width=350]
-image:figures/Benchmarks/SBEND_Edges_Emi.png[width=350]
+image:figures/Benchmarks/SBEND_Edges_Env.png[width=340]
+image:figures/Benchmarks/SBEND_Edges_Emi.png[width=340]
 +
 Even in this case, a good overall agreement has been found between the
 two codes in term of beam size and emittance.
@@ -613,8 +613,8 @@ E1=0, E2=0,
 ....
 +
 .TRACE 3D and _OPAL_ comparison: SBEND with field index and default field map
-image:figures/Benchmarks/FI_SBEND_FMDef_Env_T2.png[width=350]
-image:figures/Benchmarks/FI_SBEND_FMDef_Emi_T2.png[width=350]
+image:figures/Benchmarks/FI_SBEND_FMDef_Env_T2.png[width=340]
+image:figures/Benchmarks/FI_SBEND_FMDef_Emi_T2.png[width=340]
 +
 Concerning the emittances and vertical beam size, a perfect agreement
 has been found, instead a defocusing effect appears in the horizontal
@@ -625,8 +625,8 @@ which the fringe field extension has been changed in the thin lens
 approximation.
 +
 .TRACE 3D and _OPAL_ comparison: SBEND with field index and test field map
-image:figures/Benchmarks/FI_SBEND_FMTest_Env_T2.png[width=350]
-image:figures/Benchmarks/FI_SBEND_FMTest_Emit_T2.png[width=350]
+image:figures/Benchmarks/FI_SBEND_FMTest_Env_T2.png[width=340]
+image:figures/Benchmarks/FI_SBEND_FMTest_Emit_T2.png[width=340]
 
 [[ssec:T3DtoOPAL]]
 From TRACE 3D to _OPAL-t_
@@ -875,8 +875,7 @@ with
 latexmath:[\epsilon_x(x, P_x) = \sqrt{\langle x^2 \rangle \langle P_x^2\rangle - \langle xP_x \rangle^2}]
 where latexmath:[P_x = \beta\gamma x'], not the trace-like emittance
 which is calculated as
-latexmath:[\epsilon_x(x, x') = \beta\gamma\sqrt{\langle x^2 \rangle \langle x'^2 \rangle - \langle xx' \rangle^2}]
-
+latexmath:[\epsilon_x (x, x') = \beta \gamma \sqrt{\langle x^2 \rangle \langle x'^{2} \rangle - \langle xx' \rangle^2}]
 [prstab2003]. In Figure [plot-emit-csr-on], a trace-like horizontal
 emittance is also calcualted for the _OPAL_ output beam distributions.
 Like the ELEGANT result, this trace-like emittance doesn’t grow in the